Dynamic Content (website,portal, blog, newsfeed, etc.)

About (English version): 

The GEAR tool has been designed to cover the whole process of reinforcing gender equality in academia and research. 

This online tool is targeted at all staff, from the bottom to the top, working in research and higher education institutions. This includes research and teaching staff; human resources, administrative and support staff; middle and top level management. While not directly targeting students, this group is addressed through various measures that are described in the tool.

As both women and men take part in research and higher education institutions, promoting gender equality structural change is not a women’s issue. Men are explicitly called upon to engage, together with women, in initiatives towards the modernisation of research institutions and gender equality.

What can you find in this online tool?

Total energy: 
285

Share the resource

About (English version): 

The aim of this site is to assist research funding and performing organizations as well as researchers and peers reviewers/evaluators with the know-how to integrate sex and gender considerations into policies, programmes, and projects, and to raise awareness about the importance of sex and gender in research and innovation.

On this website you will find manuals/tools on how to integrate gender analysis into research, examples and references for a better understanding, recommendations on how to integrate the sex and gender analysis into the university curricula in Higher Education and finally a range of indicators to support the monitoring and evaluation of these procedures.

Type of resource: 
Media Type: 
Dynamic Content (website,portal, blog, newsfeed, etc.)
Language(s): 
English
Date created: 
2016
Is this resource freely shareable?: 
Shareable
Total energy: 
225

Share the resource

About (English version): 

In recent decades, policymakers, research organizations, and funders of science have made efforts to increase the participation of women in science teams, leadership roles, and evaluation panels. More recently, journals and funders have turned their attention to sex-and-gender aspects of the content of research. Early-career scientists have much to gain from embracing this trend, including an increased chance of getting published and an edge when applying for research funds.

But embracing the trend requires a shift in the way research is done. First, scientists must recognize that including a sex or gender dimension in their research is possible and useful. Then they must use adequate methods to design their studies, analyze their data, and report their results. This is likely to require extra time and resources, but researchers promoting the initiative argue it is worth the effort. "It's a really powerful way to see new things," says Londa Schiebinger, a science historian at Stanford University in California.  Schiebinger directs a project called "Gendered Innovations in Science, Health & Medicine, Engineering, and Environment." Funded by Stanford University, the U.S. National Science Foundation, and the European Commission, among others, the project aims to encourage and equip scientists to rethink their work under a sex-and-gender-conscious lens.

Public identifier: 
http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2014/03/adding-sex-and-gender-dimensions-your-research
Type of resource: 
Media Type: 
Dynamic Content (website,portal, blog, newsfeed, etc.)
Language(s): 
English
Date created: 
2014
Is this resource freely shareable?: 
Shareable
Total energy: 
209

Share the resource

About (English version): 

Two cohorts of intellectually talented 13-year-olds were identified in the 1970s (1972–1974 and 1976–1978) as being in the top 1% of mathematical reasoning ability (1,037 males, 613 females). About four decades later, data on their careers, accomplishments, psychological well-being, families, and life preferences and priorities were collected. Their accomplishments far exceeded base-rate expectations: Across the two cohorts, 4.1% had earned tenure at a major research university, 2.3% were top executives at “name brand” or Fortune 500 companies, and 2.4% were attorneys at major firms or organizations; participants had published 85 books and 7,572 refereed articles, secured 681 patents, and amassed $358 million in grants. For both males and females, mathematical precocity early in life predicts later creative contributions and leadership in critical occupational roles. On average, males had incomes much greater than their spouses’, whereas females had incomes slightly lower than their spouses’. Salient sex differences that paralleled the differential career outcomes of the male and female participants were found in lifestyle preferences and priorities and in time allocation.

Type of resource: 
Media Type: 
Dynamic Content (website,portal, blog, newsfeed, etc.)
Language(s): 
English
Date created: 
2014
Is this resource freely shareable?: 
Shareable
Scientific discipline: 
Time period covered: 
1970 - 2010
Total energy: 
164

Share the resource